Voting Rights Act
Witnesses testified on the implications of the Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which overturned a key provision of the Vo… read more
Witnesses testified on the implications of the Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which overturned a key provision of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Two of the five witnesses were members of the House of Representatives. Representative John Lewis (D-GA) gave a history of the VRA and said the Court’s decision made him “want to cry.” James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) explained why the VRA remained necessary and criticized justices for disregarding years of congressional work. Constitutional attorney Michael Carvin argued that Section 2 continued to be enough to prevent racial discrimination in voting. The two other witnesses disagreed, citing evidence on the pervasiveness of racial discrimination in voting districts across the country. close
People in this video
-
Michael A. Carvin Attorney
Hosting Organization
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision
Greg Stohr was interviewed by telephone about the Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder in which the court r…
-
Open Phones on Voting Rights Act Decision
Telephone lines were open for reactions to the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric H. H…
-
Representative Hoyer on the Voting Rights Act
Representative Steny Hoyer (D-MD) spoke on the House floor about the work Congress needed to do on the Voting Rights Act…
-
President Obama on the Voting Rights Act
President Obama marked the 50th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, calling on Congress to update the law and urging c…